Видео

He could've just kept a little longer and the length of the video would be pi :(

2 is one plus one. Sorry buddy.

bruh

anyone else just randomly get recommended this or... just me?

The way he talks is like it is a normal video but his words are replaced with prime numbers

why ?😂

6:14 what did mike say?? A slur?

"No, you forgot 57" ~ Grothendeick

Did i just watch Micheal look at a pot?

Its as if he is a bot programmed to say those prime numbers for three hours

Woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow

The thumbnail says: ?

dont let terrance howard watch this

A square is a line prism and a tetrahedron is a line anti prism.

He stands so still, you don’t notice he’s there

How is this man not going insane?

This is such a vsauce thing to do

didn't say "prime numbers" once

"We've got to stop this weirdly fruity priest!" The priest in question:

this was too little numbers make another one

2:51 It’s literally a binary tree, a data structure used in computer science to store higher and lower values.

People who watched the whole video without blinking 👇

30 seconds in, and he already skipped a number (it's 27)

What kind of lighting equipment was used in this video?

Last time i checked you weren’t an indian youtuber i watch to understand some math equations (no racism/harsh intentions)

at the end i thought video was cut but noticed clock keep ticking realised he just stares at my soul😱😨

Now: PRIME Flavours

Schizophrenia brought me here.

Am i the only one who watched the full video ?

he missed 17,905

4:47 2 x -6 = 1

Bro is not gonna get the green baby 👺👎

Pi counting:

The numbers Mason! What do they mean?

so terrence howard was correct

“30,011” so inspiring

i left this with more questions than i had when i clicked on this video, and i didn't have many

fell asleep while listening to Vsauce videos, woke up to this video before passing out again

At no point in time do you have even a 1% probability to get Monty’s ⅓ or 33.3% no-car probability. As one of the leaders of the ⅓-⅔ Cult once proudly proclaimed that probabilities are space, you don't actually see them. He's absolutely right. Though you see two doors that you didn't pick, they both combined to contain only ⅓ or 33.3% no-car probability to you. That means each door only has a ⅙ or 16.6% no-car probability. Bottom line - the Monty Hall Problem is a 50/50 guess to stay or switch from your ⅓ or 33.3% probability to get the car and your ⅓ or 33.3% probability to not get the car. The ⅓-⅔ Cult made the mistake that just by seeing two doors you must have twice the advantage to not pick the car. Well that’s why the doors are there, to mess with you, on a game show. But what did you expect from someone who was NOT a mathematician or a university math professor? Because she had a high I.Q.? That’s human calculator both candy bar and compact car each costing $100 real situations distorted Rain Man smarts. Back then we didn’t have social platforms for mass reach and instant debates. Biased media thirsting for a feel-good story just ran with it while blatantly ignoring THOUSANDS of actual mathematicians and university professors disagreeing with this false claim. Well, it’s never too late to get it right. First is to call out all these drones of the Emperor’s New Clothes to stop with the nonsense. You now know where you’ve made the mistake, which I'm 66.6% certain that most of you knew it all along.🤙

i swear this entire community is psychopaths including Mike

Uhh...2 can be divided evenly Michael....

If I choose wrong, leaves two doors for monty. He can only choose the wrong. THAT LEAVES ONE DOOR. WTF IS THE PROBLEM HERE

Somehow reluctance floods in me. M: if 2^(1/2) is rational, 2^(1/2)=a/b is even why is this false? Cant root of 2 be the double of a prime ratio? thanks

The longer I live on this planet, the longer I believe that Michael is a divine lifeform above humanity

The way he writes 8 makes me mad

I am this man. But my nickname is not this man. I am MRBOT

hey, i'm french and i've heard of foucault's currents, i am not sure but i think they are basically lenz's law, but we call it foucault's current, can anyone help with this ?

1:31:56 .................huh?

you never shut up when you say numbers who cares

1:21:20 that look made me feel horny